Original Posted By: Don Rucker
Some things just seem like common sense. The Model-T didn't have seat belts butthe steering had a habit of jack knifing easily. Probably would have been alot more older Model-T drivers if seat belts were in fashion in those days.Jon--------Jon Coxwell GN-1 BuilderRecycle and preserve the planetRead this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ______Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:40:50 -0500Subject: Pietenpol-List: Lycoming 0290 for Piet ? & updated website with Broadheadpictures
Pietenpol-List: Lycoming 0290 for Piet ? & updated website with Broadhead
=0A> Pietenpol-List: Re: The purist and seat belts
Original Posted By:> coxwelljon(at)frontiernet.net
=0A=0A=0ASeat belts weren't even required until the late 60s.- Studebaker was the first to make them std eq in 1959.- I'm currently restoring a '63 Ford Falcon and, you guessed it.- No seatbelts.- Evedently you didn't need them in 1963.Doug DeverIn beautiful Stow Ohio-=0A> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: The purist and seat belts
=0A=0A=0ASeat belts weren't even required until the late 60s.- Studebaker was the first to make them std eq in 1959.- I'm currently restoring a '63 Ford Falcon and, you guessed it.- No seatbelts.- Evedently you didn't need them in 1963.Doug DeverIn beautiful Stow Ohio-=0A> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: The purist and seat belts
> Pietenpol-List: Re: The purist and seat belts
Original Posted By:> coxwelljon(at)frontiernet.net
Seat belts weren't even required until the late 60s. Studebaker was the first to make them std eq in 1959. I'm currently restoring a '63 Ford Falcon and=2C you guessed it. No seatbelts. Evedently you didn't need them in 1963.Doug DeverIn beautiful Stow Ohio> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: The purist and seat belts
Seat belts weren't even required until the late 60s. Studebaker was the first to make them std eq in 1959. I'm currently restoring a '63 Ford Falcon and=2C you guessed it. No seatbelts. Evedently you didn't need them in 1963.Doug DeverIn beautiful Stow Ohio> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: The purist and seat belts
Original Posted By: Michael Perez
> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com> t.net>> > Some things just seem like common sense. The Model-T didn't have seat belts but the steering had a habit of jack knifing easily. Probably would have been a lot more older Model-T drivers if seat belts were in fashion in those days.> > Jon> > --------> Jon Coxwell > GN-1 Builder> Recycle and preserve the planet> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 768#310768> > > > > > > ============================================> > > ________________________________________________________________________________Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com> t.net>> > Some things just seem like common sense. The Model-T didn't have seat belts but the steering had a habit of jack knifing easily. Probably would have been a lot more older Model-T drivers if seat belts were in fashion in those days.> > Jon> > --------> Jon Coxwell > GN-1 Builder> Recycle and preserve the planet> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 768#310768> > > > > > > ============================================> > > ________________________________________________________________________________Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:20:55 -0700 (PDT)