Pietenpol-List: Strength of Various Woods
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 1997 5:06 am
Original Posted By: Greg Cardinal
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Strength of Various Woods>Hello Brent!>As promised I dug out my copy of ANC-18 Design of Wood Aircraft>Structures, 2nd ed. 1951, which is 234 pages of wonderful details on>wooden aircraft construction methods. This manual was put together for>joint Air Force, Navy and Civil use. I'll provide some basic numbers>comparing Sitka Spruce, Douglas Fir and Western Hemlock based on a>typical 15% moisture content from Table 2-6, p. 22.> Density (lb/cu ft) Spruce 28> Fir 33> Hemlock 30>> Static Bending Spruce 5,300> Fiber Stress at Fir 5,900> proportional limit Hemlock 6,200> (psi)>> Compression parallel Spruce 3,530> to grain fiber stress Fir 4,220> at proportional limit Hemlock 4,080> (psi)>> Shear strength Spruce 990> parallel to grain Fir 950> (psi) Hemlock 860>> Tension strength Spruce 9,400> parallel to grain Fir 10,900> (psi) Hemlock 11,000>>So what does all this mean? There are other physical properties in>ANC-18, but I think these are enough to show that the hemlock, properly>selected for quality and adhering to the standard grain runout of no>more than 1 inch in 12 (preferrably 1 in 15), is an acceptable>substitute for spruce in the Air Camper. The Air Camper is a pretty>conservative design and is not intended for aerobatics, so the hemlock>should provide you with the robustness Bernie Pietenpol intended. You>might want to make up some small test samples of your wood to pull and>bend with your adhesive of choice for your own peace of mind and the FAA>inspector.>>In case you were wondering, I am a design engineer for the Lockheed>Skunk Works. Just so you knew the data didn't just come off the>street. Hope this helps.>Mike List>________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Strength of Various Woods>Hello Brent!>As promised I dug out my copy of ANC-18 Design of Wood Aircraft>Structures, 2nd ed. 1951, which is 234 pages of wonderful details on>wooden aircraft construction methods. This manual was put together for>joint Air Force, Navy and Civil use. I'll provide some basic numbers>comparing Sitka Spruce, Douglas Fir and Western Hemlock based on a>typical 15% moisture content from Table 2-6, p. 22.> Density (lb/cu ft) Spruce 28> Fir 33> Hemlock 30>> Static Bending Spruce 5,300> Fiber Stress at Fir 5,900> proportional limit Hemlock 6,200> (psi)>> Compression parallel Spruce 3,530> to grain fiber stress Fir 4,220> at proportional limit Hemlock 4,080> (psi)>> Shear strength Spruce 990> parallel to grain Fir 950> (psi) Hemlock 860>> Tension strength Spruce 9,400> parallel to grain Fir 10,900> (psi) Hemlock 11,000>>So what does all this mean? There are other physical properties in>ANC-18, but I think these are enough to show that the hemlock, properly>selected for quality and adhering to the standard grain runout of no>more than 1 inch in 12 (preferrably 1 in 15), is an acceptable>substitute for spruce in the Air Camper. The Air Camper is a pretty>conservative design and is not intended for aerobatics, so the hemlock>should provide you with the robustness Bernie Pietenpol intended. You>might want to make up some small test samples of your wood to pull and>bend with your adhesive of choice for your own peace of mind and the FAA>inspector.>>In case you were wondering, I am a design engineer for the Lockheed>Skunk Works. Just so you knew the data didn't just come off the>street. Hope this helps.>Mike List>________________________________________________________________________________