Pietenpol-List: RE: pitot tube
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 1998 12:26 pm
Original Posted By: Jim Barlow
Michael D Cuy wrote:>I made the same decision Steve E. made and in May or June I get to >fiddle with the same dilemma. Would a static port on the side of the >fuselage like the factory planes have work or is that just good for >other static instruments ? Also put my pitot in the wing LE but >epoxied in a flush mounted 'receptacle making a bent probe replace- >ment easy. Was a little extra work but...MC I haven't done this myself, but I've always felt that two static ports(one on each side of the fuselage) connected together and then tee'd offto the instruments would be a good arrangement. When one port seespressure the other would see vacuum and the system would balance out.Also if one got plugged the other might provide some relative reading atleast. Just a thought!Bill________________________________________________________________________________
Michael D Cuy wrote:>I made the same decision Steve E. made and in May or June I get to >fiddle with the same dilemma. Would a static port on the side of the >fuselage like the factory planes have work or is that just good for >other static instruments ? Also put my pitot in the wing LE but >epoxied in a flush mounted 'receptacle making a bent probe replace- >ment easy. Was a little extra work but...MC I haven't done this myself, but I've always felt that two static ports(one on each side of the fuselage) connected together and then tee'd offto the instruments would be a good arrangement. When one port seespressure the other would see vacuum and the system would balance out.Also if one got plugged the other might provide some relative reading atleast. Just a thought!Bill________________________________________________________________________________