Pietenpol-List: First flight and misc
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 1998 2:36 pm
Original Posted By: steve(at)byu.edu
After much ground testing and some test flights by a friend, my FordEscort powered Piet finally took to the air with me at the controls lastSaturday. With air temp 50F and field altitude 4880', the old planeperformed very well. I've never had a flying thrill quite like this one. When I shoved the throttle forward the straight pipes on the Ford began tosing. I was airborne before I knew it climbing rather steeply at 60 mph. By the time I reached the end of the 4200' runway, I was at 300' andreally climbing well compared to my tired C-120. The sensation of rollingmy eyes to the left or right and being able to look down so easily wasamazing--my bod was that close to both sides at once. I could glance overmy shoulder for traffic easily. With the cut out in the wing and myheight, I was comfortable looking under and yet had good coverage above. The tail wasn't nearly as sensitive as in the C-120. I came over thefence at 65 mph and flared too high--that long nose! I dropped in around5', putting the traditional straight axle wooden-gear legs and motorcycletires to the test. They ironed out the bounce amazingly well. I didbetter on my next five landings but now have great respect for the gearthat those old Jenny's flew with in WWI. I've soloed 4-5 other airplanesbut haven't had the thrill that this first flight gave me. I immediatelydecided to keep the Piet and sell my 1/3 interest in the C-120.My plane weighs 770 lbs, pretty heavy for a Piet. Yet, at 9200' it wouldstill climb well. I don't have accurate figures but with a watch I'dguess 300' per minute. Cruise at 4300 rpm was around 75mph with a 2.5 to1 reduction. Having the 70-80 hp seems to compensate pretty well forsome of the weight. I can't wait to fly it again and enjoy that open-airfeel.Since my plane is fairly heavy, but performs well, I've decided to keep ata single-seater. In addition, winter is coming to this country and I'mscheming to add a light heater: two t's in the water hoses, a fan, and aradiator core with a cover over the front cockpit. Has anyone else hadany Piet experience with such an installation? With full car ignition andalternator, obviously the power plant can handle the electrical need.I used aluminum on the leading edge of the wing and would do it again. Iused it on the trailing edge as well. Works well. CU________________________________________________________________________________
After much ground testing and some test flights by a friend, my FordEscort powered Piet finally took to the air with me at the controls lastSaturday. With air temp 50F and field altitude 4880', the old planeperformed very well. I've never had a flying thrill quite like this one. When I shoved the throttle forward the straight pipes on the Ford began tosing. I was airborne before I knew it climbing rather steeply at 60 mph. By the time I reached the end of the 4200' runway, I was at 300' andreally climbing well compared to my tired C-120. The sensation of rollingmy eyes to the left or right and being able to look down so easily wasamazing--my bod was that close to both sides at once. I could glance overmy shoulder for traffic easily. With the cut out in the wing and myheight, I was comfortable looking under and yet had good coverage above. The tail wasn't nearly as sensitive as in the C-120. I came over thefence at 65 mph and flared too high--that long nose! I dropped in around5', putting the traditional straight axle wooden-gear legs and motorcycletires to the test. They ironed out the bounce amazingly well. I didbetter on my next five landings but now have great respect for the gearthat those old Jenny's flew with in WWI. I've soloed 4-5 other airplanesbut haven't had the thrill that this first flight gave me. I immediatelydecided to keep the Piet and sell my 1/3 interest in the C-120.My plane weighs 770 lbs, pretty heavy for a Piet. Yet, at 9200' it wouldstill climb well. I don't have accurate figures but with a watch I'dguess 300' per minute. Cruise at 4300 rpm was around 75mph with a 2.5 to1 reduction. Having the 70-80 hp seems to compensate pretty well forsome of the weight. I can't wait to fly it again and enjoy that open-airfeel.Since my plane is fairly heavy, but performs well, I've decided to keep ata single-seater. In addition, winter is coming to this country and I'mscheming to add a light heater: two t's in the water hoses, a fan, and aradiator core with a cover over the front cockpit. Has anyone else hadany Piet experience with such an installation? With full car ignition andalternator, obviously the power plant can handle the electrical need.I used aluminum on the leading edge of the wing and would do it again. Iused it on the trailing edge as well. Works well. CU________________________________________________________________________________