Pietenpol-List: Re: Spars, Spruce, Fir and Three Piece Wings
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 1999 1:14 am
Original Posted By: john hodnette
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Spars, Spruce, Fir and Three Piece Wings>Jim Wills in the UK designed a box spar for the Piet. The motivation, I>believe, arises from the fact that spruce prices here are extortionate.>The built up spar offers a considerable cost saving, probably a reasonable>weight saving and, no doubt, contributes to the approved maximum all up>weight of 1200lbs.>>Before you all throw your hands up in horror, Jim had to make a few>(structural) changes to allow the design to be assessed and approved by our>rigourous PFA.>>Anyway, the box dimensions are as follows:>>FRONT>>upper and lower spar caps - 1-1/4" x 7/8"(thickness)>>ply web - 1/8" on one side, with additional web on opposite side and void>filling with spruce where required for strength at attachment points, e.g.>lift struts.>>There is also a 7/8" x 1/2" spruce vertical web stiffener at rib locations.>>REAR>>upper and lower spar caps - 7/8" x 3/4"(thickness)>>ply web and strengthening as above.>>I can't really tell you more than that as I haven't started building it>yet, but Jim would happily sell you his drawings at (I'm sure) a modest>price. He also designed a neat three piece wing with automatic aileron>connection and transport fittings for the wings.>>The whole set of plans, including the original Piet plans cos me 110>sterling - about $160, so his additional drawings shouldn't be too much.>>>>...I think a box spar would even be better, but I wouldn't know>>how to calculate the dimensions, although I found the formulas in the>>wood handbook. 1" box spar would be strong and would have no >hidden>defects.>>Any body know of a comparable aircraft that uses box spars?>Nottinghamshire>England>>leo(at)deadly.demon.co.uk>>________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Spars, Spruce, Fir and Three Piece Wings>Jim Wills in the UK designed a box spar for the Piet. The motivation, I>believe, arises from the fact that spruce prices here are extortionate.>The built up spar offers a considerable cost saving, probably a reasonable>weight saving and, no doubt, contributes to the approved maximum all up>weight of 1200lbs.>>Before you all throw your hands up in horror, Jim had to make a few>(structural) changes to allow the design to be assessed and approved by our>rigourous PFA.>>Anyway, the box dimensions are as follows:>>FRONT>>upper and lower spar caps - 1-1/4" x 7/8"(thickness)>>ply web - 1/8" on one side, with additional web on opposite side and void>filling with spruce where required for strength at attachment points, e.g.>lift struts.>>There is also a 7/8" x 1/2" spruce vertical web stiffener at rib locations.>>REAR>>upper and lower spar caps - 7/8" x 3/4"(thickness)>>ply web and strengthening as above.>>I can't really tell you more than that as I haven't started building it>yet, but Jim would happily sell you his drawings at (I'm sure) a modest>price. He also designed a neat three piece wing with automatic aileron>connection and transport fittings for the wings.>>The whole set of plans, including the original Piet plans cos me 110>sterling - about $160, so his additional drawings shouldn't be too much.>>>>...I think a box spar would even be better, but I wouldn't know>>how to calculate the dimensions, although I found the formulas in the>>wood handbook. 1" box spar would be strong and would have no >hidden>defects.>>Any body know of a comparable aircraft that uses box spars?>Nottinghamshire>England>>leo(at)deadly.demon.co.uk>>________________________________________________________________________________