Page 1 of 1

Pietenpol-List: Piet fuselages

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2001 6:16 pm
by matronics
Original Posted By: Doug413(at)aol.com
Hey guys, on the plans for the extended fuselage that BP drew (the extra 9 1/2") it appears that there is a slight undercamber in the area of the rear fuselage, not a lot but definitely there if you sight along the lower longeron looking from he tail. The original shorter fuselage definitely does not have this. Is this intentional and are there any problems with this? Jeff in Texas waiting for an impending storm this evening________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Pietenpol-List: William Wynne

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2001 6:20 pm
by matronics
Original Posted By: "Christian Bobka"
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: William WynneOscar,Thanks for the report on William. Good news! Doug Bryant Wichita Ks________________________________________________________________________________

Pietenpol-List: RE:

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2001 6:27 pm
by matronics
Original Posted By: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com
Hej Jannica,Vlkommen til Pietenpols!I think you've made a good choice for a first airplane. I also approve ofyour choice of glues - I've used resorcinol and T-88 epoxy on my Pietenpol.The only concern with resorcinol is to be certain that your shop and thepieces you are gluing are at least 70 F (21 C) to get a good reliable joint.At least one of your countrymen has some experience working on Pietenols.My friend Leif Brunstrm from just outside Stockholm has helped me quite abit on mine, when he's been in the U.S. on business.Just keep subscribing to this forum and just about any question you have canbe answered.Good Luck!Jack Phillips-----Original Message-----