RE: Pietenpol-List: aileron
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:05 pm
Original Posted By: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com
The GN-1 wing is similar to the Pietenpol's. The under camber is therebutthe aileron hinge setup is different. The hinge is on the center of theaileron spar and needs a gap seal from top to bottom. The Piet setup withthe piano hinge along the top edge makes more sense would be less prone tobinding/hinge center line errors and wouldn't need a gap seal. I started building a GN-1 before I knew the differences between thedesigns. At this point in time my project is a blend of the two designs. Theadjustable wing position of the Pietenpol is definitely an advantage. Gregadesigned the GN-1 when Cub parts were plentiful. The landing gear, enginemount, tank and nose bowl can all be Cub parts.John-----Original Message-----
The GN-1 wing is similar to the Pietenpol's. The under camber is therebutthe aileron hinge setup is different. The hinge is on the center of theaileron spar and needs a gap seal from top to bottom. The Piet setup withthe piano hinge along the top edge makes more sense would be less prone tobinding/hinge center line errors and wouldn't need a gap seal. I started building a GN-1 before I knew the differences between thedesigns. At this point in time my project is a blend of the two designs. Theadjustable wing position of the Pietenpol is definitely an advantage. Gregadesigned the GN-1 when Cub parts were plentiful. The landing gear, enginemount, tank and nose bowl can all be Cub parts.John-----Original Message-----