Pietenpol-List: 1.7 oz
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:58 am
Original Posted By: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]"
Bill,WOW -- YOU GOT IT -- IT IS A TYPO -- WAY TO GO -- I should have picked that up. Now my airplane matches the design example weights. The computations on the plans are still bogus, but when done correctly the results match mine and the design c.g. range. My aft c.g. problem remains, however. Like I said previously, the design specified aft c.g. limit of 34.5% is well aft of my comfort zone. These plans have been a nightmare of errors.Thanks,TomOn Jul 1, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Bill Church wrote:> Tom,>> I have read that the new CAD drawings for the GN-1 have quite a few > errors. This is likely one of them.> MAYBE this one is simply a "5" where a "3" should be (i.e. maybe > the number for the ailwheel should be 30 instead of 50).>> Perhaps you could do the calculations using 30 in place of the 50, > and see what you get.>> It's a lucky thing that you're smart enough to see that something > isn't right, and are doing something about it. Maybe this is one of > the reasons why the plans are no longer available for sale.>> Bill C.>>Thomas Bernietsbe________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: 1.7 ozDate: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:03:23 -0500
Bill,WOW -- YOU GOT IT -- IT IS A TYPO -- WAY TO GO -- I should have picked that up. Now my airplane matches the design example weights. The computations on the plans are still bogus, but when done correctly the results match mine and the design c.g. range. My aft c.g. problem remains, however. Like I said previously, the design specified aft c.g. limit of 34.5% is well aft of my comfort zone. These plans have been a nightmare of errors.Thanks,TomOn Jul 1, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Bill Church wrote:> Tom,>> I have read that the new CAD drawings for the GN-1 have quite a few > errors. This is likely one of them.> MAYBE this one is simply a "5" where a "3" should be (i.e. maybe > the number for the ailwheel should be 30 instead of 50).>> Perhaps you could do the calculations using 30 in place of the 50, > and see what you get.>> It's a lucky thing that you're smart enough to see that something > isn't right, and are doing something about it. Maybe this is one of > the reasons why the plans are no longer available for sale.>> Bill C.>>Thomas Bernietsbe________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: 1.7 ozDate: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:03:23 -0500