Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rib Truss design=2C ala 1940
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:06 pm
Original Posted By: mdredmond(at)gmail.com
Matt=2CIf Pieti Lowells performance is to be believed=2C and I think it is since I have seen videos of him taking off. Then you would gain more lift (Read better climb) and a lower stall speed since the 613.5 and the 612 stall at a higher angle of attack. I wonder though if most of the performance doesn't come from his highly modified Model A (close to 90hp).Me=2C I'm going with the std airfoil. I will seek Lowel's advice on the Model A though. I can always build a different wing for not a lot of $ down the road. I agree with mike cuy. Just put a longer wing on it.Just my .02Doug DeverIn beautiful Stow OhioDate: Tue=2C 8 Sep 2009 12:54:21 -0500Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rib Truss design=2C ala 1940
Matt=2CIf Pieti Lowells performance is to be believed=2C and I think it is since I have seen videos of him taking off. Then you would gain more lift (Read better climb) and a lower stall speed since the 613.5 and the 612 stall at a higher angle of attack. I wonder though if most of the performance doesn't come from his highly modified Model A (close to 90hp).Me=2C I'm going with the std airfoil. I will seek Lowel's advice on the Model A though. I can always build a different wing for not a lot of $ down the road. I agree with mike cuy. Just put a longer wing on it.Just my .02Doug DeverIn beautiful Stow OhioDate: Tue=2C 8 Sep 2009 12:54:21 -0500Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rib Truss design=2C ala 1940