Re: Pietenpol-List: Just ordering plans.....Questions
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:20 pm
Original Posted By: Amsafetc
>Ken,Since you are modifying the arrangement from that shown in the plans, you need to ensure that your modifications will result in basically the same performance as the plans-built system.The net result you are looking for is to ensure that the control surfaces will deflect the proper amount based on normal control stick movements. The plans do not specify the recommended throws for each of the different control surfaces, and there has been some discussion about this in the past (check the archives). However, in the UK, homebuilt aircraft are much more regulated than in North America, and the Light Aircraft Association has produced a set of Type Acceptance Data Sheets for each aircraft approved for manufacture in the UK, and there is one for the Pietenpol Air Camper (see link below). Page 4 of the latest revision of the Pietenpol TADS lists 20=C2=B0 up and 20=C2=B0 down for the recommended elevator deflections. The number of degrees of deflection of the control stick or bellcrank arm is less important than the actual deflection of the control surfaces. However, the length of the bellcrank should be very close to the dimensions of the elevator control horn connections, so the deflections of the two should also be very close.I would suggest that you add the elevator control horns to your mock-up and see what your resulting elevator deflection is. I haven't built my control system yet, so I can't provide personal empirical data but it seems odd that it would require the full use of all possible space to achieve the desired elevator deflections (if I understand you correctly, in saying that the control stick hits the seat front or back in order to achieve the throws you are measuring). Maybe others can comment on that.Basically, every Pietenpol is unique - (some more than others) - and every little change can have numerous effects. Just make sure that you will be able to achieve the recommended deflections AS A MINIMUM. You can always install stops to prevent too much throw, but you won't be able to add more throw if you have nowhere for the stick to go.http://www.lightaircraftassociation.co. ... ER.pdfBill C.Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 8#351688le, List Admin.________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Just ordering plans.....Questions
>Ken,Since you are modifying the arrangement from that shown in the plans, you need to ensure that your modifications will result in basically the same performance as the plans-built system.The net result you are looking for is to ensure that the control surfaces will deflect the proper amount based on normal control stick movements. The plans do not specify the recommended throws for each of the different control surfaces, and there has been some discussion about this in the past (check the archives). However, in the UK, homebuilt aircraft are much more regulated than in North America, and the Light Aircraft Association has produced a set of Type Acceptance Data Sheets for each aircraft approved for manufacture in the UK, and there is one for the Pietenpol Air Camper (see link below). Page 4 of the latest revision of the Pietenpol TADS lists 20=C2=B0 up and 20=C2=B0 down for the recommended elevator deflections. The number of degrees of deflection of the control stick or bellcrank arm is less important than the actual deflection of the control surfaces. However, the length of the bellcrank should be very close to the dimensions of the elevator control horn connections, so the deflections of the two should also be very close.I would suggest that you add the elevator control horns to your mock-up and see what your resulting elevator deflection is. I haven't built my control system yet, so I can't provide personal empirical data but it seems odd that it would require the full use of all possible space to achieve the desired elevator deflections (if I understand you correctly, in saying that the control stick hits the seat front or back in order to achieve the throws you are measuring). Maybe others can comment on that.Basically, every Pietenpol is unique - (some more than others) - and every little change can have numerous effects. Just make sure that you will be able to achieve the recommended deflections AS A MINIMUM. You can always install stops to prevent too much throw, but you won't be able to add more throw if you have nowhere for the stick to go.http://www.lightaircraftassociation.co. ... ER.pdfBill C.Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 8#351688le, List Admin.________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Just ordering plans.....Questions