Pietenpol-List: Rudder Pedals VS Rudder Bar
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:44 am
Original Posted By: "Larry Vetter"
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Modifications as the result of operational experience> > Ive made several changes to Fat Bottom Girl over the last several months andhave promised updates. Here they are:> > Wood Struts> The original wood struts have Douglas Fir tops and bottoms sandwiching aircraftplywood. I bought them from a friend. I noticed signs of > delamination between the fir and the plywood on all the struts at > around the 250 hour mark. The worst delamination was on the left > rear strut, which I used as a support point for loading passengers. > Im pretty sure the guy who built the struts used T-88 but I > dont remember. Anyway, a dear friend who shall, as always, > remain nameless (Gary Boothe) made new struts for me. They are > constructed from four hickory sticks laminated together. The glue > lines on the original struts ran parallel to the wing, the new > laminations are perpendicular. They seem quite stout though I have > not flown them very long. Gary is a saint.> > Note: For what its worth, the holes on the old struts showed no > sign of distress or elongation. Thats with 260 hours, several > hundred takeoffs and landings, and a significant wing dragging > episode on each side. > > Wing Cross Wires> I used the cross wires at the right front cockpit to hold the wing > in place. I can honestly say that I do not remember why. I also > do not remember why on earth I lopped off the ears from the top > motor mount where the diagonal cabanes would mount. Regardless, I > added diagonal cabanes and got rid of the wires to improve > ingress/egress from the front cockpit. > > I did not want to cut a bunch of fabric and remake motor mounts, so > I carefully crafted an East Texas Redneck Modification (ETRM) to > provide the front mount for the diagonals. I welded them to the > vertical cabanes at the top. Ill improve that ETRM when we re-> cover the plane. See attached photo.> > Clourcars Prop> Ive taken so much abuse for the ugly-but-effective Warp Drive > prop that I broke down and bought a wooden prop from Cloudcars. It > is 68x34. They originally sent me a 68X27 which Jay calculated to > be similar in pitch to my Warp at 7.5 degrees. It wasnt enough > pitch. They very kindly provided another propeller. It appears to > have a little more functional pitch than the Warp. The plane > climbs a little slower, but still at better than 500 fpm, and flies > about 10% faster. Since were not allowed to fly our Cloudcars > in the rain I may switch to the Warp for traveling to and from > Brodhead, and then use the pretty wooden prop while there. See > attached photo. > > Landing Gear Springs> I think Ive talked about this already. I re-did the gear with > springs instead of bungees after one of the bungees failed and left > me limping down the taxiway at an awkward angle. I used Hans Van > der Voorts drawings.> > The Dreaded Corvair> The Weseman 5th bearing has been installed for ~60 hours. So far > so good.> > Last year at this time I noticed a sudden drop in power of about > 150 rpm. It turned out to be a burned valve. Roy Szarafinski re-> did the heads for me. The reworked heads actually give me an > increase in static of 150 rpm. I originally had the heads done at > a car shop several years ago. Its safe to say that Roy does > significantly more sophisticated work than most car shops.> > Use as you see fit.> > --------> Kevin "Axel" Purtee> NX899KP> Austin/Georgetown, TX> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 597#364597> > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/painted_prop_211.jpg> http://forums.matronics.com//files/all_3_mods_169.jpg> > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Rudder Pedals VS Rudder Bar
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Modifications as the result of operational experience> > Ive made several changes to Fat Bottom Girl over the last several months andhave promised updates. Here they are:> > Wood Struts> The original wood struts have Douglas Fir tops and bottoms sandwiching aircraftplywood. I bought them from a friend. I noticed signs of > delamination between the fir and the plywood on all the struts at > around the 250 hour mark. The worst delamination was on the left > rear strut, which I used as a support point for loading passengers. > Im pretty sure the guy who built the struts used T-88 but I > dont remember. Anyway, a dear friend who shall, as always, > remain nameless (Gary Boothe) made new struts for me. They are > constructed from four hickory sticks laminated together. The glue > lines on the original struts ran parallel to the wing, the new > laminations are perpendicular. They seem quite stout though I have > not flown them very long. Gary is a saint.> > Note: For what its worth, the holes on the old struts showed no > sign of distress or elongation. Thats with 260 hours, several > hundred takeoffs and landings, and a significant wing dragging > episode on each side. > > Wing Cross Wires> I used the cross wires at the right front cockpit to hold the wing > in place. I can honestly say that I do not remember why. I also > do not remember why on earth I lopped off the ears from the top > motor mount where the diagonal cabanes would mount. Regardless, I > added diagonal cabanes and got rid of the wires to improve > ingress/egress from the front cockpit. > > I did not want to cut a bunch of fabric and remake motor mounts, so > I carefully crafted an East Texas Redneck Modification (ETRM) to > provide the front mount for the diagonals. I welded them to the > vertical cabanes at the top. Ill improve that ETRM when we re-> cover the plane. See attached photo.> > Clourcars Prop> Ive taken so much abuse for the ugly-but-effective Warp Drive > prop that I broke down and bought a wooden prop from Cloudcars. It > is 68x34. They originally sent me a 68X27 which Jay calculated to > be similar in pitch to my Warp at 7.5 degrees. It wasnt enough > pitch. They very kindly provided another propeller. It appears to > have a little more functional pitch than the Warp. The plane > climbs a little slower, but still at better than 500 fpm, and flies > about 10% faster. Since were not allowed to fly our Cloudcars > in the rain I may switch to the Warp for traveling to and from > Brodhead, and then use the pretty wooden prop while there. See > attached photo. > > Landing Gear Springs> I think Ive talked about this already. I re-did the gear with > springs instead of bungees after one of the bungees failed and left > me limping down the taxiway at an awkward angle. I used Hans Van > der Voorts drawings.> > The Dreaded Corvair> The Weseman 5th bearing has been installed for ~60 hours. So far > so good.> > Last year at this time I noticed a sudden drop in power of about > 150 rpm. It turned out to be a burned valve. Roy Szarafinski re-> did the heads for me. The reworked heads actually give me an > increase in static of 150 rpm. I originally had the heads done at > a car shop several years ago. Its safe to say that Roy does > significantly more sophisticated work than most car shops.> > Use as you see fit.> > --------> Kevin "Axel" Purtee> NX899KP> Austin/Georgetown, TX> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 597#364597> > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/painted_prop_211.jpg> http://forums.matronics.com//files/all_3_mods_169.jpg> > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Rudder Pedals VS Rudder Bar