Pietenpol-List: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

An archive of the Matronics Pietenpol Listserve.
Locked
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: "McNarry, John"
I still don't know what exactly happened, but the Piet I saw that ended up upside-down on the runway due to broken landing gear had the Jenny-style gear (bungee snapped, but why...?). Anyone have any statistics? I have to decide on gear myself one of these days (if those darn plans ever get here... [grumble]).> Aw shucks. I was hoping someone out there was reporting on > engine/flight testing. > > I still haven't been able to choose a landing gear. I really like the > Jenny style but I think the split gear as on G_BUCO would be safer > and easier to anchor the brake torque. > Any preferences comments or ideas appreciated.> > J Mc > Web Developer, http://www.autoeurope.comHomepage: http://www.wrld.com/w3builder__________ ... __________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By:> rdecosta(at)autoeurope.com (Richard DeCosta)
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: RE: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: McNarry, John[SMTP:Mcnarry(at)assiniboinec.mb.ca]
________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By:> McNarry, John[SMTP:Mcnarry(at)assiniboinec.mb.ca]
*I* just wish that I could find a nice grass runway to practice on!steveeJim Skinner wrote:> One thing I failed to consider in my first post was the height of the> axle above the ground. My Flybaby had 8.00 x 4 tires so the axle was> close to the ground. On a Pietenpol the wheels could be wire wheels> putting the axle much higher off the ground. Still could be a problem> but not nearly so bad.>> Jim Skinner> ----------
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: RE: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Gary McArthur
Thanks JimThat's what I had been wondering about. The Tall split gear probably makes the most sense from a safety point of view.J Mc________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: michael list
Richard DeCosta wrote:> > I still don't know what exactly happened, but the Piet I saw that> ended up upside-down on the runway due to broken landing gear had the> Jenny-style gear (bungee snapped, but why...?). Anyone have any> statistics? I have to decide on gear myself one of these days (if> those darn plans ever get here... [grumble]).> > > Aw shucks. I was hoping someone out there was reporting on> > engine/flight testing.> >> > I still haven't been able to choose a landing gear. I really like the> > Jenny style but I think the split gear as on G_BUCO would be safer> > and easier to anchor the brake torque.> > Any preferences comments or ideas appreciated.> >> > J Mc> >> ----------------------------------------> Web Developer, http://www.autoeurope.com> Homepage: http://www.wrld.com/w3builderDoesn't the "Cub" style gear use "bungee" rings...? I guess you couldget a failure whether you wind em yourself or purchase a "ring"? Just athought...Gary...________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: RE: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: McNarry, John[SMTP:Mcnarry(at)assiniboinec.mb.ca]
One thing I failed to consider in my first post was the height of theaxle above the ground. My Flybaby had 8.00 x 4 tires so the axle wasclose to the ground. On a Pietenpol the wheels could be wire wheelsputting the axle much higher off the ground. Still could be a problembut not nearly so bad.Jim Skinner________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Gary McArthur
________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Steve Eldredge
>I would be interested in hearing from those of us who have flown with >the different styles of landing gear. There preferences and comments >as to handling. Is the staight axle more stable? Does the split gear >roll to the outside of a swerve making a ground loop more probable? >>J Mc John- I don't have a ton of Piet time, but the Cub type lands easieron pavement than the straight axel gear. Little more cush. Also w/the straight gear you can wrap and re-wrap the bungee chords untilyou get the right amount of give. Too loose and the wind cantip you side to side too much, too tight and the tires and airframetake bigger jolts. There is no alignment issue w/ the straight gearlike you have when you weld up the split gear. It's true from wheelto wheel right away. I hear from those much wiser that a planewith wheels pointed in different directions can make it a wholedifferent animal. Hopefully others w/ more experience will comment. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Ian Holland
. There is no alignment issue w/ the straight gear> like you have when you weld up the split gear. It's true from wheel> to wheel right away. I hear from those much wiser that a plane> with wheels pointed in different directions can make it a whole> different animal. Hopefully others w/ more experience will > comment. Mike C. > > Taildraggers should be aligned straight or should have a little bit oftoe out (a couple of degrees). If they are toed in they get really squirrely.I landed the Piet I rode in from the front seat that had the solid axlegear and about the only difference I could tell was the lack of rollingfriction from the big motorcycle wheels. It was on grass.John K________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: dcsBell(at)netcom.ca
I think that I favor the split gear because of the greater potentialcushoning effect. How do people build their split gear?It occurs to me that I could weld the Vs, them temporarily mount them tothe fuselage (or a jig), then slide the two axels over the ends of a longpipe to insure they are parallel, then tack the assembly into position.Remove the pipe and: TaDa! parallel axels.I'm a beginning builder and not an experienced metal worker so I don't havea lot of confidence in this idea, but it does sound reasonable. :-)Randy Stockberger>>>I would be interested in hearing from those of us who have flown with >>the different styles of landing gear. There preferences and comments >>as to handling. Is the staight axle more stable? Does the split gear >>roll to the outside of a swerve making a ground loop more probable? >>>>J Mc >>John- I don't have a ton of Piet time, but the Cub type lands easier>on pavement than the straight axel gear. Little more cush. Also w/>the straight gear you can wrap and re-wrap the bungee chords until>you get the right amount of give. Too loose and the wind can>tip you side to side too much, too tight and the tires and airframe>take bigger jolts. There is no alignment issue w/ the straight gear>like you have when you weld up the split gear. It's true from wheel>to wheel right away. I hear from those much wiser that a plane>with wheels pointed in different directions can make it a whole>different animal. Hopefully others w/ more experience will >comment. Mike C. >>________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: Re: Landing Gear (WAS: RE: Testing)

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Brent Reed
John Kahn wrote:> > . There is no alignment issue w/ the straight gear> > like you have when you weld up the split gear. It's true from wheel> > to wheel right away. I hear from those much wiser that a plane> > with wheels pointed in different directions can make it a whole> > different animal. Hopefully others w/ more experience will> > comment. Mike C.> >> >> Taildraggers should be aligned straight or should have a little bit of> toe out (a couple of degrees). If they are toed in they get really> squirrely.> > I landed the Piet I rode in from the front seat that had the solid axle> gear and about the only difference I could tell was the lack of rolling> friction from the big motorcycle wheels. It was on grass.> > John Kno comment on the gear John, just wanted you to know that I'm on theInternet now at home. When would you like to come over for a visit.Domenic________________________________________________________________________________
Locked