Original Posted By: Jim Skinner
Hi, folks.I'm new to this group and wanted to introduce myself. Icurrently own and fly a Tri-Pacer, which is for sale. Theproceeds from the sale will finance the airplane buildingproject. It's been a really nice airplane, but I want tobuild. I can always rent C-150's (yawn) while I do that.I have plans for a Pietenpol, and the more I read about it,the better I like it. Seems to be an airplane for the typeof flying I want to do. It will also mean I have to get thetaildragger endorsement.Been a tinkerer all my life (cars and houses) and am nostranger to tools. Haven't tried building an airplane, sowill need lots of encouragement and advice when I finally getinto it.I live near Molalla, Oregon, which is about 30 miles southof Portland and just about as far from Salem. This is niceflying country and there are plenty of small airstripsaround, both paved and turf. I live next to a paved one.I'd love to meet someone here in Oregon who is eitherbuilding and/or flying a Pietenpol.Don't know what engine I want to use in a Pietenpol yet. I'mnot necessarily a purist who has to have a Model A, but itdoes have it's advantages: inexpensive, low RPM (no PSRU),reliable. It's biggest disadvantage is the low HP output.I've seen Ron Kelley's report on this engine on the BPA webpage, so I know this engine can pull more HP reliably, butI'm still undecided. Better to concentrate my efforts onbuilding the airframe, probably, for now. I may wind upwith an "A," but it will likely be a bit "warmed up".Well, that's enough (probably too much) for an intro. I lookforward to hearing from others.Mike________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Introducing myself
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: "Richard F. Rapp"
>It will also mean I have to get the>taildragger endorsement.>I don't think there is such a thing. It strongly suggest you get someinstruction in a taildragger and not just run out and fly one. But youdon't need any sort of logbook entry to fly a tail dragger. (Unless thingshave changed since I got my license...)>>I live near Molalla, Oregon, which is about 30 miles south>of Portland and just about as far from Salem. This is nice>flying country and there are plenty of small airstrips>around, both paved and turf. I live next to a paved one.>I'd love to meet someone here in Oregon who is either>building and/or flying a Pietenpol.I grew up near Eugend and lived near Portland for a while. The Willamettevalley is a nice place to fly low and slow airplanes like the Pietenpol.There are a number of them around you. I know there was one in the Salemarea but don't have the owners number handy. I would recommend a trip to the Brodhead flyin. It's a great place to seelots of Pietenpols and many of the variations as well as talk with manyexperienced builders.Jim Skinner ________________________________________________________________________________
>It will also mean I have to get the>taildragger endorsement.>I don't think there is such a thing. It strongly suggest you get someinstruction in a taildragger and not just run out and fly one. But youdon't need any sort of logbook entry to fly a tail dragger. (Unless thingshave changed since I got my license...)>>I live near Molalla, Oregon, which is about 30 miles south>of Portland and just about as far from Salem. This is nice>flying country and there are plenty of small airstrips>around, both paved and turf. I live next to a paved one.>I'd love to meet someone here in Oregon who is either>building and/or flying a Pietenpol.I grew up near Eugend and lived near Portland for a while. The Willamettevalley is a nice place to fly low and slow airplanes like the Pietenpol.There are a number of them around you. I know there was one in the Salemarea but don't have the owners number handy. I would recommend a trip to the Brodhead flyin. It's a great place to seelots of Pietenpols and many of the variations as well as talk with manyexperienced builders.Jim Skinner ________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: Michael King
> > I live near Molalla, Oregon, which is about 30 miles south> of Portland and just about as far from Salem. This is nice> flying country and there are plenty of small airstrips> around, both paved and turf. I live next to a paved one.> I'd love to meet someone here in Oregon who is either> building and/or flying a Pietenpol.I live in Salem. I have a couple of big pieces ready to join together(assoon as the weather is more consistently warm), as well as some otherstuff.Dick Derydickdery(at)teleport.com(503)585-9595.________________________________________________________________________________
> > I live near Molalla, Oregon, which is about 30 miles south> of Portland and just about as far from Salem. This is nice> flying country and there are plenty of small airstrips> around, both paved and turf. I live next to a paved one.> I'd love to meet someone here in Oregon who is either> building and/or flying a Pietenpol.I live in Salem. I have a couple of big pieces ready to join together(assoon as the weather is more consistently warm), as well as some otherstuff.Dick Derydickdery(at)teleport.com(503)585-9595.________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: "McNarry, John"
>Hi, folks.Mike, Welcome to the Piet group ! ps- Don't worry about thetailwheel bit- you can get some dual in a Cub or Champ during thebuilding process and by the time you are ready to fly you'll be fine.I found if you start on grass and slowly transition to pavement andcrosswinds it helps. All the he-man stories about how sharp you haveto be to fly a tailwheel are bunk- I'm proof ! Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
>Hi, folks.Mike, Welcome to the Piet group ! ps- Don't worry about thetailwheel bit- you can get some dual in a Cub or Champ during thebuilding process and by the time you are ready to fly you'll be fine.I found if you start on grass and slowly transition to pavement andcrosswinds it helps. All the he-man stories about how sharp you haveto be to fly a tailwheel are bunk- I'm proof ! Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: Michael D Cuy
Please read an excerpt from FAR 61.31 regarding operations as pilot in commandof tailwheel aircraft: 61.31 (i) Additional training required for operatingtailwheel airplanes.(1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may actas pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received andlogged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplaneand received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorizedinstructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheelairplane. The flight training must include at least the following the maneuversand procedures: (i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings; (ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against suchlandings); and (iii) Go-around procedures.(2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this sectionis not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheelairplane before April 15, 1991.I hope this clears up any misconception.Jim Skinner wrote:>> >It will also mean I have to get the> >taildragger endorsement.> >> I don't think there is such a thing. It strongly suggest you get some> instruction in a taildragger and not just run out and fly one. But you> don't need any sort of logbook entry to fly a tail dragger. (Unless things> have changed since I got my license...)>> >> >I live near Molalla, Oregon, which is about 30 miles south> >of Portland and just about as far from Salem. This is nice> >flying country and there are plenty of small airstrips> >around, both paved and turf. I live next to a paved one.> >I'd love to meet someone here in Oregon who is either> >building and/or flying a Pietenpol.>> I grew up near Eugend and lived near Portland for a while. The Willamette> valley is a nice place to fly low and slow airplanes like the Pietenpol.> There are a number of them around you. I know there was one in the Salem> area but don't have the owners number handy.>> I would recommend a trip to the Brodhead flyin. It's a great place to see> lots of Pietenpols and many of the variations as well as talk with many> experienced builders.>> Jim Skinner>--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
Please read an excerpt from FAR 61.31 regarding operations as pilot in commandof tailwheel aircraft: 61.31 (i) Additional training required for operatingtailwheel airplanes.(1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may actas pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received andlogged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplaneand received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorizedinstructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheelairplane. The flight training must include at least the following the maneuversand procedures: (i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings; (ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against suchlandings); and (iii) Go-around procedures.(2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this sectionis not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheelairplane before April 15, 1991.I hope this clears up any misconception.Jim Skinner wrote:>> >It will also mean I have to get the> >taildragger endorsement.> >> I don't think there is such a thing. It strongly suggest you get some> instruction in a taildragger and not just run out and fly one. But you> don't need any sort of logbook entry to fly a tail dragger. (Unless things> have changed since I got my license...)>> >> >I live near Molalla, Oregon, which is about 30 miles south> >of Portland and just about as far from Salem. This is nice> >flying country and there are plenty of small airstrips> >around, both paved and turf. I live next to a paved one.> >I'd love to meet someone here in Oregon who is either> >building and/or flying a Pietenpol.>> I grew up near Eugend and lived near Portland for a while. The Willamette> valley is a nice place to fly low and slow airplanes like the Pietenpol.> There are a number of them around you. I know there was one in the Salem> area but don't have the owners number handy.>> I would recommend a trip to the Brodhead flyin. It's a great place to see> lots of Pietenpols and many of the variations as well as talk with many> experienced builders.>> Jim Skinner>--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: Steve Eldredge
Hi Mike Welcome to the group! I find it to very thought provoking and a lot of good ideas are shared here. I'm not one of the purists but unless you are going for an exact replica who is? I expect BP himself would still be changing the design some if he could. I started out making metal fittings for an Improved Air Camper and then got a "good deal" on a GN-1 that some one else started. I have all the airframe at the 1" thick stage and have gotten carried away by the idea of building my own engine. I have been wondering about the effects of the longer engine mount and moving the wing back to make the Piets fly on opposed engine power. How does this affect the flight characteristics compared to the original? (jump in guys). I still like the four in a row swing a large slow prop. Have fun Mike I think you'll find building at least the same if not more fun that flying 150sJohn McNarry________________________________________________________________________________
Hi Mike Welcome to the group! I find it to very thought provoking and a lot of good ideas are shared here. I'm not one of the purists but unless you are going for an exact replica who is? I expect BP himself would still be changing the design some if he could. I started out making metal fittings for an Improved Air Camper and then got a "good deal" on a GN-1 that some one else started. I have all the airframe at the 1" thick stage and have gotten carried away by the idea of building my own engine. I have been wondering about the effects of the longer engine mount and moving the wing back to make the Piets fly on opposed engine power. How does this affect the flight characteristics compared to the original? (jump in guys). I still like the four in a row swing a large slow prop. Have fun Mike I think you'll find building at least the same if not more fun that flying 150sJohn McNarry________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: RE: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: Jim Sury
On Wednesday, April 22, 1998 8:43 AM, David B. Schober [SMTP:dbs(at)fscvax.wvnet.edu] wrote:> Please read an excerpt from FAR 61.31 regarding operations as pilot in command> of tailwheel aircraft: 61.31 (i) Additional training required for operating> tailwheel airplanes.> (1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may act> as pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received and> logged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplane> and received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized> instructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheel> airplane. The flight training must include at least the following the maneuvers> and procedures:> (i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;> (ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against such> landings); and> (iii) Go-around procedures.> (2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this section> is not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel> airplane before April 15, 1991.>> I hope this clears up any misconception.>>All the above is true, however it does not apply to experimentals. You can legally fly an experimental taildragger without the endorsement. Not recommended, but legal.Stevee________________________________________________________________________________
On Wednesday, April 22, 1998 8:43 AM, David B. Schober [SMTP:dbs(at)fscvax.wvnet.edu] wrote:> Please read an excerpt from FAR 61.31 regarding operations as pilot in command> of tailwheel aircraft: 61.31 (i) Additional training required for operating> tailwheel airplanes.> (1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may act> as pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received and> logged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplane> and received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized> instructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheel> airplane. The flight training must include at least the following the maneuvers> and procedures:> (i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;> (ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against such> landings); and> (iii) Go-around procedures.> (2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this section> is not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel> airplane before April 15, 1991.>> I hope this clears up any misconception.>>All the above is true, however it does not apply to experimentals. You can legally fly an experimental taildragger without the endorsement. Not recommended, but legal.Stevee________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: Ed0248
Steve,What reference do you have that says it doesn't apply to experimentals?Steve Eldredge wrote:> On Wednesday, April 22, 1998 8:43 AM, David B. Schober> [SMTP:dbs(at)fscvax.wvnet.edu] wrote:> > Please read an excerpt from FAR 61.31 regarding operations as pilot in> command> > of tailwheel aircraft: 61.31 (i) Additional training required for> operating> > tailwheel airplanes.> > (1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may> act> > as pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has> received and> > logged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel> airplane> > and received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized> > instructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a> tailwheel> > airplane. The flight training must include at least the following the> maneuvers> > and procedures:> > (i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;> > (ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against> such> > landings); and> > (iii) Go-around procedures.> > (2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this> section> > is not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel> > airplane before April 15, 1991.> >> > I hope this clears up any misconception.> >> >>> All the above is true, however it does not apply to experimentals. You can> legally fly an experimental taildragger without the endorsement. Not> recommended, but legal.>> Stevee--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
Steve,What reference do you have that says it doesn't apply to experimentals?Steve Eldredge wrote:> On Wednesday, April 22, 1998 8:43 AM, David B. Schober> [SMTP:dbs(at)fscvax.wvnet.edu] wrote:> > Please read an excerpt from FAR 61.31 regarding operations as pilot in> command> > of tailwheel aircraft: 61.31 (i) Additional training required for> operating> > tailwheel airplanes.> > (1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may> act> > as pilot in command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has> received and> > logged flight training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel> airplane> > and received an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized> > instructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a> tailwheel> > airplane. The flight training must include at least the following the> maneuvers> > and procedures:> > (i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;> > (ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against> such> > landings); and> > (iii) Go-around procedures.> > (2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this> section> > is not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel> > airplane before April 15, 1991.> >> > I hope this clears up any misconception.> >> >>> All the above is true, however it does not apply to experimentals. You can> legally fly an experimental taildragger without the endorsement. Not> recommended, but legal.>> Stevee--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: "David B. Schober"
I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificatedaircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are required/obligatedto conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a testpilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out there toverify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I couldcheck with the FSDO for straight skinny.Ed________________________________________________________________________________
I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificatedaircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are required/obligatedto conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a testpilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out there toverify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I couldcheck with the FSDO for straight skinny.Ed________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: RE: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: "David B. Schober"
I'll find and post the reference. I thought it was in part 61 as part of the exclusions deleted from the previous FAR post. I'd love to check it now but my CD is at home and well the weather is so good, I have to go flying.SteveeOn Wednesday, April 22, 1998 1:54 PM, Ed0248 [SMTP:Ed0248(at)aol.com] wrote:> I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificated> aircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are required/obligated> to conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a test> pilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out there to> verify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I could> check with the FSDO for straight skinny.>> Ed________________________________________________________________________________
I'll find and post the reference. I thought it was in part 61 as part of the exclusions deleted from the previous FAR post. I'd love to check it now but my CD is at home and well the weather is so good, I have to go flying.SteveeOn Wednesday, April 22, 1998 1:54 PM, Ed0248 [SMTP:Ed0248(at)aol.com] wrote:> I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificated> aircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are required/obligated> to conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a test> pilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out there to> verify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I could> check with the FSDO for straight skinny.>> Ed________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: Steve Eldredge
As best I can tell, Unless an aircraft is operated as a public aircraft, the pilothas to be certified in the category and class and type if a type is required. Eventest pilots need the appropriate ratings. The changes to 61.31 make no provisionsfor operating an experimental taildragger. It simply states that to act as PICina tailwheel aircraft you need the instruction listed unless you have documentaryevidence of PIC experiance in a tailwheel airplane before April 15, 1991Ed0248 wrote:> I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificated> aircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are required/obligated> to conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a test> pilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out there to> verify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I could> check with the FSDO for straight skinny.>> Ed--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
As best I can tell, Unless an aircraft is operated as a public aircraft, the pilothas to be certified in the category and class and type if a type is required. Eventest pilots need the appropriate ratings. The changes to 61.31 make no provisionsfor operating an experimental taildragger. It simply states that to act as PICina tailwheel aircraft you need the instruction listed unless you have documentaryevidence of PIC experiance in a tailwheel airplane before April 15, 1991Ed0248 wrote:> I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificated> aircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are required/obligated> to conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a test> pilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out there to> verify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I could> check with the FSDO for straight skinny.>> Ed--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: Michael D Cuy
Steve,I just looked upthe exceptions and they only apply to the ratings not thetraining requirements. As I read it, you do need the tailwheel training toact as PIC in tailwheels.Steve Eldredge wrote:> I'll find and post the reference. I thought it was in part 61 as part of> the exclusions deleted from the previous FAR post. I'd love to check it> now but my CD is at home and well the weather is so good, I have to go> flying.>> Stevee>> On Wednesday, April 22, 1998 1:54 PM, Ed0248 [SMTP:Ed0248(at)aol.com] wrote:> > I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificated> > aircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are> required/obligated> > to conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a> test> > pilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out> there to> > verify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I> could> > check with the FSDO for straight skinny.> >> > Ed--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
Steve,I just looked upthe exceptions and they only apply to the ratings not thetraining requirements. As I read it, you do need the tailwheel training toact as PIC in tailwheels.Steve Eldredge wrote:> I'll find and post the reference. I thought it was in part 61 as part of> the exclusions deleted from the previous FAR post. I'd love to check it> now but my CD is at home and well the weather is so good, I have to go> flying.>> Stevee>> On Wednesday, April 22, 1998 1:54 PM, Ed0248 [SMTP:Ed0248(at)aol.com] wrote:> > I'm not sure, but I think that as long as you're flying a certificated> > aircraft, normal, utility, experimental or limited, you are> required/obligated> > to conform to the part 61 requirements. Otherwise, anyone could be a> test> > pilot, with no training or certificating requirements. Any PE's out> there to> > verify/kabosh? I'm a ME, so it's out of my area of expertise, but I> could> > check with the FSDO for straight skinny.> >> > Ed--David B.Schober, CPEInstructor, Aviation MaintenanceFairmont State CollegeNational Aerospace Education CenterRt. 3 Box 13Bridgeport, WV 26330-9503(304) 842-8300________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: MikeHinchman
HI MIKE , MY NAME IS TERRY CHAMBERLIN , I LIVE IN GRAND LEDEGE MI. MY PARTNER AND IARE BUILDING A CORVAIR POWERED PIETENPOL . WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON A WORK SHOPIN MY POLE BARN . WE JUST COMPLETED IT ABOUT A MOUTH AGO . WE LOOKED AROUNDFOR A WHILE BEFORE WE DIECIDED TO USE THE CORVAIR ENGINE . WE BELONG TO ALOCAL EAA CHAPTER . THAT HELPS A LOT . IF YOU GET A CHANCE TO GO TO THEPIETENPOL FLYING IN AT BORADHEAD WISCONSIN IN AUG. IT A LOT OF FUN AND YOU GETTO MEET A LOT OF PEOPLE WITH THE SAME INTEREST WE HAVE . THE PIETENPOL . GOODLUCK HOPE TO SEE YOU AT BROADHEAD THIS SUMMER .________________________________________________________________________________
HI MIKE , MY NAME IS TERRY CHAMBERLIN , I LIVE IN GRAND LEDEGE MI. MY PARTNER AND IARE BUILDING A CORVAIR POWERED PIETENPOL . WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON A WORK SHOPIN MY POLE BARN . WE JUST COMPLETED IT ABOUT A MOUTH AGO . WE LOOKED AROUNDFOR A WHILE BEFORE WE DIECIDED TO USE THE CORVAIR ENGINE . WE BELONG TO ALOCAL EAA CHAPTER . THAT HELPS A LOT . IF YOU GET A CHANCE TO GO TO THEPIETENPOL FLYING IN AT BORADHEAD WISCONSIN IN AUG. IT A LOT OF FUN AND YOU GETTO MEET A LOT OF PEOPLE WITH THE SAME INTEREST WE HAVE . THE PIETENPOL . GOODLUCK HOPE TO SEE YOU AT BROADHEAD THIS SUMMER .________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: RE: Introducing myself
Original Posted By: MikeHinchman
Thanks, Mike. I am looking forward to building.By the way, I saw the pictures of your project. Very nice!Mike________________________________________________________________________________
Thanks, Mike. I am looking forward to building.By the way, I saw the pictures of your project. Very nice!Mike________________________________________________________________________________