Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

An archive of the Matronics Pietenpol Listserve.
Locked
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: TJTREV(at)webtv.net (Theodore Trevorrow)
Ya know, I have only asked questions on here on two occasions . . .specific questions about how a particular piece is "supposed" to go on thePiet, and I have yet to get an answer to either one. We have beaten thewire wheel question to death a hundred times, as well as the weight andbalance issue (should I move the wing or lengthen the engine mount?). Aren't there any BUILDERS on here who can answer a simple question?________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Jay
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfacesMr. Pietenpol adjusted weight and balance by moving the wing . unlessits way out. Then I'd start looking to solve the underlying problem. There was a new Piet at Brodhead this year built by a guy named PerkinsI think. He welded his cabane braces instead of making them adjustable.Then!!! he realised he was out of trim. He solved the problem by movingthe "A" forward 7" .It looked good . took away some of that pugnosedlook that Piets have. If you go much futher forward they start lookinglike turboprops. By the way this plane was beautiful. some of the bestworkmanship I've ever seen.Gulf orange . A real prize winner.Ted________________________________________________________________________________Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:52:13 -0500
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By:>> Theodore Trevorrow
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces>>AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>>I didn't ask about weight and balance.>>
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By:> Theodore Trevorrow
AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I didn't ask about weight and balance.
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Gene Rambo
Maybe we missed it...please restate your question.walt-----------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/-----Original Message-----
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

RE: Pietenpol-List: engine choise

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: dkowell(at)cstone.net [mailto:dkowell(at)cstone.net]
I talked to a guy using a EA81 Direct Drive. He was very happy with it. 750 FPM climb (estimated, no VSI)60X32 Tennessee Wood prop3000 RPM take off2100RPM cruse = 70 mphWeber carb from pintoHonda Civic rad mounted between engine and firewall. Engine mount same as ford +4 inchesWing "as far back as it would go" to get good Weight Balance.Marc-----Original Message-----
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: "Dan Loegering"
Anybody have a 4-qt. oil sump for an A65 that they want to sell? I'm in the market. There is one on eBay at the moment and I may bid on that one if I can't find another. The gentleman raised the starting bid on this one from $99 to $149 since yesterday, but he's had no bids on it yet.Thanks!Oscar ZunigaSan Antonio, TXmailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.comwebsite at http://www.flysquirrel.net________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: tail surfacesDate: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:54:16 -0600
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

> Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: "Gene Rambo"
> Trevorrow)> > Mr. Pietenpol adjusted weight and balance by moving the wing . unless> its way out. Then I'd start looking to solve the underlying problem.> There was a new Piet at Brodhead this year built by a guy named Perkins> I think. He welded his cabane braces instead of making them adjustable.> Then!!! he realised he was out of trim. He solved the problem by moving> the "A" forward 7" .It looked good . took away some of that pugnosed> look that Piets have. If you go much futher forward they start looking> like turboprops. By the way this plane was beautiful. some of the best> workmanship I've ever seen.> Gulf orange . A real prize winner.> > Ted> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

>> Re: Pietenpol-List: tail surfaces

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: "Davis, Marc"
>>>Trevorrow)>>>> Mr. Pietenpol adjusted weight and balance by moving the wing . unless>> its way out. Then I'd start looking to solve the underlying problem.>> There was a new Piet at Brodhead this year built by a guy named Perkins>> I think. He welded his cabane braces instead of making them adjustable.>> Then!!! he realised he was out of trim. He solved the problem by moving>> the "A" forward 7" .It looked good . took away some of that pugnosed>> look that Piets have. If you go much futher forward they start looking>> like turboprops. By the way this plane was beautiful. some of the best>> workmanship I've ever seen.>> Gulf orange . A real prize winner.>>>> Ted>>>>>>>>>>________________________________________________________________________________
Locked