Pietenpol-List: automotive seat belt retractor for should harness

An archive of the Matronics Pietenpol Listserve.
Locked
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Pietenpol-List: automotive seat belt retractor for should harness

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Isablcorky(at)aol.com
Why couldn't the shoulder harness strap be attached to an automobile seatbelt retractormounted in the aft fuse? This would allow freedom of movement yet stillkeep you retained in an impact.I see them on ebay for various cars for like $15DJ_=This email has been scanned for known viruses and made safe for viewing by Half Price Hosting, a leading email and web hosting provider. For more information on an anti-virus email solution, visit .________________________________________________________________________________
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Pietenpol-List: automotive seat belt retractor for should harness

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: DJ Vegh
The same thing was suggested to me by one of the engineers at work. He did addthat the tighter the seatbelt is the better off you are in a crash. He is aavid car buff who races on week ends and is very knowledgeable on stuff like this.He also suggested putting in a single shoulder harness in the front seat. He saidthat a single harness is ok to have mounted below the shoulder because ina crash you body is able to twist instead of being compressed downward. Not quiteas safe as a 4 point harness but it might be a workable light weight solution.Anyone have an opinion on this?Chris T.Sacramento, Ca ----- Original Message -----
matronics
Posts: 81779
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Pietenpol-List: automotive seat belt retractor for should harness

Post by matronics »

Original Posted By: Michael D Cuy
Dick,First thing I need you and everybody else to do is to change my emailaddress in your address book(s) to :sbobka(at)charter.netI am closing out the compuserve account.Answers to your (old) questions are inserted below.Chris> Chris,> I am a little confused (make that very confused as to the pulleys I> should be ordering for my Pietenpol.> *Elevator--I am using 1/8" cable from stick to bell crank and 3/32> for bell crank to elevator. On the torque tube should I use larger> pulley on the "up" cable where the cable deflects about 110 degrees. The> plans show 2" pulleys. AS&S catalog says they are only good for 15> degree cable deflection. I have one (2") MS24566-3B--is that OK for> the "down" cable where there is less deflection? or should I be using> the MS20220 pulleys?It is always best to use the largest pulley possible. Too small a pulleywill cause the cable to fail. There is an AD on the Luscombe because theydid not use big enough pulleys, nor did they leave enough room for biggerones. You would be better off with 3/32" cable over the smaller pulley ifthat is all you can fit. 3/32" is fine for what we are doing and that areais very accessible during each preflight inspection. My Aeronca 50-C prewarChief uses 3/32" throughout. 3/32 is about 1/2 the weight of 1/8".Galvanized is superior to Stainless as it is more flexible and is stronger.> *Aileron cables--they deflect more than 15 degrees at each pulley,> but the plans show 2" pulleys for 1/8" cable. Is there a reason for> using the 1/8"+ pulleys for the 3/32 cable? I will be using 3/32 cable> for the ailerons. What pulley specification and diameter are you using?> I checked the Archives and could not find good info. Respond on> the Pietenpol List if you feel this question and the answer should go> there.I don't quite understand the question but I would use a 2" min diameterpulley with a 3/32" cable.> Dick Hartwig________________________________________________________________________________Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:48:59 -0500
Locked