Original Posted By: "Douwe Blumberg"
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 9 Msgs - 09/05/04I still maintain that copyright law clearly shows that the copyright for the BPA newsletters remains with the BPA -- not the editor. BPA was the publisher and as such, owns the copyright -- not the editor. If the BPA members want to reproduce the old ones, they have that right. The editor was working at the request of the BPA which was paying for the newsletter. For example, the editorof the NY Times does not own the copyright to that newspaper, the NY Times Corp. (the publisher) does. And I'm absolutely certain that the copyright on allthe articles within those newsletters belongs with the authors of those articles -- and not with the editor. I wouldn't be too afraid of threats to sue.Fred B. ________________________________________________________________________________