Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Bingelis' Weight and Balance for

matronics · Post by **matronics** » Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:00 pm

Original Posted By: Michael D Cuy
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Bingelis' Weight and Balance forIn a message dated 10/19/04 6:13:20 PM Central Daylight Time, bconoly(at)earthlink.net writes:>Bert,I don't see where it says anything about a Negative 208.8 inch pounds. I see where the oil was removed : -7.20 X -27.0 = Positive 194.40 inch pounds.E.W.C.G. is 9.69 inches.Chuck G.________________________________________________________________________________Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:18:37 -0400

matronics · Post by **matronics** » Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:25 pm

Original Posted By:
Hmmmm Mine say -7.2 and - 29 giving 208.8 but it's listed as Negative208.8. I wonder if I havean older edition or something with an error? Minesays first edition, second printing.Thaanks----- Original Message -----

matronics · Post by **matronics** » Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:02 pm

Original Posted By: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Bingelis' Weight and Balance forIn a message dated 10/20/04 9:06:44 AM Central Daylight Time, bconoly(at)earthlink.net writes:>Mine says:Less Oil -7.2 -27.00 194.40In the bottom left corner of this page it says: Revised 1-19-87I can't find anywhere in the front of the book, or on the cover, where it says what printing it is.Chuck G.________________________________________________________________________________