Original Posted By: Ryan Mueller
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Markle Mania 2010 final results
Pietenpol-List: Markle Mania 2010 final results
Re: Pietenpol-List: Markle Mania 2010 final results
Original Posted By: Ryan Mueller
Ryan..Thanks so much for facilitating (I DO hate this verb) the effort.JM wanted to visit me and my project last summer; alas, I was to be at OSH so could not accommodate him. I see my small contribution to Mania as an act of penance and, hopefully, goodwill.In an age of Feds throwing Billions to Bailouts, I'm warmly reminded of what it must have been like for Our Pioneers to have lent an ox or two to a neighbor in Spring in return for a larder full of summer corn in Fall. Just born too late, I guess.God Speed and Blue Skies to us all,Al ----- Original Message -----
Ryan..Thanks so much for facilitating (I DO hate this verb) the effort.JM wanted to visit me and my project last summer; alas, I was to be at OSH so could not accommodate him. I see my small contribution to Mania as an act of penance and, hopefully, goodwill.In an age of Feds throwing Billions to Bailouts, I'm warmly reminded of what it must have been like for Our Pioneers to have lent an ox or two to a neighbor in Spring in return for a larder full of summer corn in Fall. Just born too late, I guess.God Speed and Blue Skies to us all,Al ----- Original Message -----
Pietenpol-List: Markle Mania 2010 final results
Original Posted By: Michael Perez
Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Riblett 612 and angle of incidence
Original Posted By: Ken Howe
This was primarily for thermal expansion and secondarily for stiffness. It had nothing to do with the transition to turbulent flow, as the SR-71 operated at a very high Reynolds Number, even at "low" speeds.David Paule>> If you look at the underside of an SR-71, it is corrugated. ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Riblett 612 and angle of incidenceDate: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:58:20 -0700
This was primarily for thermal expansion and secondarily for stiffness. It had nothing to do with the transition to turbulent flow, as the SR-71 operated at a very high Reynolds Number, even at "low" speeds.David Paule>> If you look at the underside of an SR-71, it is corrugated. ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Riblett 612 and angle of incidenceDate: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:58:20 -0700