Original Posted By: Dan Yocum
Hey Bob,I remember a similar problem getting my strainer(s) to screw nicely into thealuminum weld-on fitting. Assuming you have the matching sizes.I forced one, NOT the way to go because the brass just rethreads thealuminum making it worthless when you need to remove it. I bought thecorrect size national pipe thread tap and lightly cleaned out the aluminumbushing threads. I also needed to do this because the finger strainerdidn't want to go far enough in. It stuck out way too much and was ugly.Also, ck the brass threads for nicks and dings which could be making thingsharder. Ck for proper size first though.Remember NOT to use pipe tape.Douwe________________________________________________________________________________Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:26:37 -0500
Pietenpol-List: finger strainer problem
Re: Pietenpol-List: finger strainer problem
Original Posted By: Douwe Blumberg
Why not use pipe tape? Not questioning you, just want to know.Dennis
Why not use pipe tape? Not questioning you, just want to know.Dennis
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "AircamperN11MS"
Subject: Pietenpol-List: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED Is there any need or advantage to reregister my Piet as an LSA? or is it E-LSA?Or can I simply fly it as an LSA since GW is under 1320#?Blue Skies,Steve D.UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Subject: Pietenpol-List: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED Is there any need or advantage to reregister my Piet as an LSA? or is it E-LSA?Or can I simply fly it as an LSA since GW is under 1320#?Blue Skies,Steve D.UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "AircamperN11MS"
As long as the gross weight of the plane is less than 1230 lbs you can fly it asa light sport. LSA designation is for the factory built plane and the E-LSAwould be a kit or plans built Light sport. Your airplane is better kept in theexperimental category. Fewer restrictions and will holder more value if youdecide to sell it. I have been flying mine for about six years without a medical.All you need is a current drivers license. Don't change a thing.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
As long as the gross weight of the plane is less than 1230 lbs you can fly it asa light sport. LSA designation is for the factory built plane and the E-LSAwould be a kit or plans built Light sport. Your airplane is better kept in theexperimental category. Fewer restrictions and will holder more value if youdecide to sell it. I have been flying mine for about six years without a medical.All you need is a current drivers license. Don't change a thing.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "tools"
Opps! 1320 lbs. I keep doing that. Nothing needs to change for you to use yourLight Sport privileges.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Opps! 1320 lbs. I keep doing that. Nothing needs to change for you to use yourLight Sport privileges.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Re: Pietenpol-List: finger strainer problem
Original Posted By: Steve Ruse
Since it doesn't do anything a LSA can't, there's no overriding reason to registerone over the other. An example I can think of is if you put lights in it, may as well register it normallyso it could be flown at night by a private or above.Yes, you can exercise LSA in any plane as long as it meets the requirement of lightsport, it doesn't have to be registered light sport. It's easier to registera plane light sport is why that exists. In your case, it doesn't reallymatter in any way that I can think of.Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ______Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 13:32:53 -0500Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: finger strainer problem
Since it doesn't do anything a LSA can't, there's no overriding reason to registerone over the other. An example I can think of is if you put lights in it, may as well register it normallyso it could be flown at night by a private or above.Yes, you can exercise LSA in any plane as long as it meets the requirement of lightsport, it doesn't have to be registered light sport. It's easier to registera plane light sport is why that exists. In your case, it doesn't reallymatter in any way that I can think of.Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ______Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 13:32:53 -0500Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: finger strainer problem
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "tools"
Scott,You sound better versed than I. Just for clarification, am I right in thinkingyou can't fly a light sport registered plane at night, ever?Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Scott,You sound better versed than I. Just for clarification, am I right in thinkingyou can't fly a light sport registered plane at night, ever?Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "AircamperN11MS"
Scott,You sound better versed than I. Just for clarification, am I right in thinkingyou can't fly a light sport registered plane at night, ever?Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Scott,You sound better versed than I. Just for clarification, am I right in thinkingyou can't fly a light sport registered plane at night, ever?Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Pietenpol-List: Re: Latex Paint Forum
Original Posted By: "womenfly2"
I believe that to be correct. I'm sure others could better explain. I don't likenight flying and don't have lights on my plane, so I haven't even looked intothat. I fly because I like the view from above and night flying doesn't giveme the same warm fuzzy feeling. Besides I can go outside and look up at thestars at night if I want to see lights. Without paying for fuel.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Latex Paint Forum
I believe that to be correct. I'm sure others could better explain. I don't likenight flying and don't have lights on my plane, so I haven't even looked intothat. I fly because I like the view from above and night flying doesn't giveme the same warm fuzzy feeling. Besides I can go outside and look up at thestars at night if I want to see lights. Without paying for fuel.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Latex Paint Forum
Original Posted By: Bkemike
Does anyone have a video of the Latex paint forum they could post on YouTube?--------Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... __________
Does anyone have a video of the Latex paint forum they could post on YouTube?--------Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... __________
Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB"
Flying on a sunlit morning, dew blown off the wings, seeing the earth through theeyes of God; that's the poetry of life. Flying at night is merely transportation,which is not, of course, the reason we love this little fabric-coveredbird.Tapped on an iPad.On Aug 7, 2013, at 11:51 AM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote:> > I believe that to be correct. I'm sure others could better explain. I don'tlike night flying and don't have lights on my plane, so I haven't even lookedinto that. I fly because I like the view from above and night flying doesn'tgive me the same warm fuzzy feeling. Besides I can go outside and look up atthe stars at night if I want to see lights. Without paying for fuel.> > --------> Scott Liefeld> Flying N11MS since March 1972> Steel Tube> C-85-12> Wire Wheels> Brodhead in 1996> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 180#406180> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Flying on a sunlit morning, dew blown off the wings, seeing the earth through theeyes of God; that's the poetry of life. Flying at night is merely transportation,which is not, of course, the reason we love this little fabric-coveredbird.Tapped on an iPad.On Aug 7, 2013, at 11:51 AM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote:> > I believe that to be correct. I'm sure others could better explain. I don'tlike night flying and don't have lights on my plane, so I haven't even lookedinto that. I fly because I like the view from above and night flying doesn'tgive me the same warm fuzzy feeling. Besides I can go outside and look up atthe stars at night if I want to see lights. Without paying for fuel.> > --------> Scott Liefeld> Flying N11MS since March 1972> Steel Tube> C-85-12> Wire Wheels> Brodhead in 1996> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 180#406180> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB"
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED I thought that the night restriction was on the Sport Pilot, not the plane. SomeLSAs have lights, A recreational or private pilot an fly them at night. I think.."To be is to do" - Socrates"To do is to be" - Sartre"Do Be Do Be Do" - Sinatra" Steve D.UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED I thought that the night restriction was on the Sport Pilot, not the plane. SomeLSAs have lights, A recreational or private pilot an fly them at night. I think.."To be is to do" - Socrates"To do is to be" - Sartre"Do Be Do Be Do" - Sinatra" Steve D.UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "tkreiner"
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED Thanks for the answers. I remember some big push for people to register theirplanes as E-LSA but could not remember the reasoning. I have a good friend who is a military flight surgeon. He told me if I ever havea question about getting a class 2 or 3 medical to call him BEFORE going tothe AME. he will check me out and if I am not going to pass, I will simply startexcercising my privaleges as a Sport Pilot. If you fail a medical flight exam you can't be a sport pilot. If you have neverfailed one, you can just begin excercising your privilages. I have hopes of getting my CFI (and Instrument and commercial on the way). If Ilose my physical i will be sunk. But I can Excercise my privilages as a Sportpilot instructor if I have not failed a physical. Blue Skies,Steve DPS I advise almost all beginning pilots to go Sport Pilot first. Go flying, enjoyyourself, If you need a 4 seater get a private ticket.UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED Thanks for the answers. I remember some big push for people to register theirplanes as E-LSA but could not remember the reasoning. I have a good friend who is a military flight surgeon. He told me if I ever havea question about getting a class 2 or 3 medical to call him BEFORE going tothe AME. he will check me out and if I am not going to pass, I will simply startexcercising my privaleges as a Sport Pilot. If you fail a medical flight exam you can't be a sport pilot. If you have neverfailed one, you can just begin excercising your privilages. I have hopes of getting my CFI (and Instrument and commercial on the way). If Ilose my physical i will be sunk. But I can Excercise my privilages as a Sportpilot instructor if I have not failed a physical. Blue Skies,Steve DPS I advise almost all beginning pilots to go Sport Pilot first. Go flying, enjoyyourself, If you need a 4 seater get a private ticket.UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "TOM STINEMETZE"
>From the EAA page on Sport Pilot Rule Synopsis:May be operated at night if the aircraft is equipped per FAR 91.205, if such operationsare allowed by the aircraft's operating limitations and the pilot holdsat least a Private Pilot certificate and a minimum of a third-class medical.Here's the link to the full page:http://www.sportpilot.org/learn/final_r ... -------Tom KreinerRead this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ______Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:37:06 -0500
>From the EAA page on Sport Pilot Rule Synopsis:May be operated at night if the aircraft is equipped per FAR 91.205, if such operationsare allowed by the aircraft's operating limitations and the pilot holdsat least a Private Pilot certificate and a minimum of a third-class medical.Here's the link to the full page:http://www.sportpilot.org/learn/final_r ... -------Tom KreinerRead this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ______Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:37:06 -0500
Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying at night
Original Posted By: "tools"
I can still get a medical but don't need one. I'd rather buy some avgas than givemy money to some doctor so he can buy gas for his Bonanza. I think the E-LSAwas pushed for re licensing all the heavy Ultra-lite planes and making themlegal.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying at night
I can still get a medical but don't need one. I'd rather buy some avgas than givemy money to some doctor so he can buy gas for his Bonanza. I think the E-LSAwas pushed for re licensing all the heavy Ultra-lite planes and making themlegal.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying at night
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "tools"
Both fun. I do particularly enjoy flying around during sunrise. I've done ittwice light civil and bunches in jets (Navy and commercial). I'd love to experienceit open cockpit. Night flight is generally calmer. Enough so that I would frequently trim the planeup and let it land itself (as the flare is optional is heavily built Navyplanes). I'd see how far out I could let go and see if it would maintain allthe way through touchdown (the S3 gets a big nose down pitch as it hits groundeffect, only did that once!). On cross countries at night in a clamshell canopy plane, I'd have the student turnoff ALL the lights (outside and in) and see a moonless starlit sky from anew perspective.Full moon nights where you don't really need lights (from a practical point ofview) are like dusk or sunrise, but it lasts forever and ever...Seen TONS of fantastic firework displays flying around, those are pretty cool andsomething I'd love to see from a Piet. The Vegas strip at night (one visualapproach has you turning right over the Seattle needlepoint looking thingy)is awesome! The LA basin, DFW metroplex, NYC all much better looking at night.The grand canyon... not so much! The entire south east after Katrina, again,big black hole. Up and down a rocky coastal expanse with lots of bio luminismat night, WOW. Spotting streaking dolphins or submarines because of bio luminism...again, wow.Right in the middle of the day, bouncing around, crazy hot, hazy enough that theview is far from spectacular, some of those flights are merely transportation.So like most things, it just depends.Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Both fun. I do particularly enjoy flying around during sunrise. I've done ittwice light civil and bunches in jets (Navy and commercial). I'd love to experienceit open cockpit. Night flight is generally calmer. Enough so that I would frequently trim the planeup and let it land itself (as the flare is optional is heavily built Navyplanes). I'd see how far out I could let go and see if it would maintain allthe way through touchdown (the S3 gets a big nose down pitch as it hits groundeffect, only did that once!). On cross countries at night in a clamshell canopy plane, I'd have the student turnoff ALL the lights (outside and in) and see a moonless starlit sky from anew perspective.Full moon nights where you don't really need lights (from a practical point ofview) are like dusk or sunrise, but it lasts forever and ever...Seen TONS of fantastic firework displays flying around, those are pretty cool andsomething I'd love to see from a Piet. The Vegas strip at night (one visualapproach has you turning right over the Seattle needlepoint looking thingy)is awesome! The LA basin, DFW metroplex, NYC all much better looking at night.The grand canyon... not so much! The entire south east after Katrina, again,big black hole. Up and down a rocky coastal expanse with lots of bio luminismat night, WOW. Spotting streaking dolphins or submarines because of bio luminism...again, wow.Right in the middle of the day, bouncing around, crazy hot, hazy enough that theview is far from spectacular, some of those flights are merely transportation.So like most things, it just depends.Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB"
Hehe, "heavy ultra light...". Is that like a heavy RJ?Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... __________
Hehe, "heavy ultra light...". Is that like a heavy RJ?Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... __________
Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: Oscar Zuniga
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED Look out Scott, them's fighten words. I ain't no doctor but I do own a fork taileddoctor killer. Steve D1948 Straight 35 BonanzaOn 08/07/13, AircamperN11MS wrote:> > I can still get a medical but don't need one. I'd rather buy some avgas thangive my money to some doctor so he can buy gas for his Bonanza. I think the E-LSAwas pushed for re licensing all the heavy Ultra-lite planes and making themlegal.> > --------> Scott Liefeld> Flying N11MS since March 1972> Steel Tube> C-85-12> Wire Wheels> Brodhead in 1996> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 187#406187> > > > > > > UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA UNCLASSIFIED Look out Scott, them's fighten words. I ain't no doctor but I do own a fork taileddoctor killer. Steve D1948 Straight 35 BonanzaOn 08/07/13, AircamperN11MS wrote:> > I can still get a medical but don't need one. I'd rather buy some avgas thangive my money to some doctor so he can buy gas for his Bonanza. I think the E-LSAwas pushed for re licensing all the heavy Ultra-lite planes and making themlegal.> > --------> Scott Liefeld> Flying N11MS since March 1972> Steel Tube> C-85-12> Wire Wheels> Brodhead in 1996> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 187#406187> > > > > > > UNCLASSIFIED________________________________________________________________________________
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "AircamperN11MS"
Steve wrote:[UNCLASSIFIED]>Steve's Piet=2C Formerly known as John and George's Piet.Yeah=2C right... and Paul's=2C Ringo's=2C and now Yoko's too. This naming convention business is for the birds. There is (and always be) "the Rudolph Piet"=2C "the Last Original"=2C and a host of others with permanent names... no matter who owns and flies them. On the other hand=2C there are various ones now owned and being flown that were built by people who have been forgotten or who were never widely known.I suppose we could do like the military guys and just give them all Bureau numbers=2C like "153297". Those would be stenciled onto the fuselage for ever and ever.On a related (unrelated?) line=2C I recently renewed the registration on Scout (there's a name for you!) and in going through the information on the registration=2C I see that it shows "Cont Motor A&C65 series". While that is technically correct (the A75 that now powers it is in that Continental series)=2C I'm wondering what happens when one re-engines with something different? There is no way that I can see to change that information on an FAA registration form... only owner's name=2C address=2C and contact info. Another example=2C my ex hangar-mate's Druine Turbulent has a VW on it=2C but the registration shows a Menasco.Oscar ZunigaMedford=2C ORAir Camper NX41CC "Scout"A75 power ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Steve wrote:[UNCLASSIFIED]>Steve's Piet=2C Formerly known as John and George's Piet.Yeah=2C right... and Paul's=2C Ringo's=2C and now Yoko's too. This naming convention business is for the birds. There is (and always be) "the Rudolph Piet"=2C "the Last Original"=2C and a host of others with permanent names... no matter who owns and flies them. On the other hand=2C there are various ones now owned and being flown that were built by people who have been forgotten or who were never widely known.I suppose we could do like the military guys and just give them all Bureau numbers=2C like "153297". Those would be stenciled onto the fuselage for ever and ever.On a related (unrelated?) line=2C I recently renewed the registration on Scout (there's a name for you!) and in going through the information on the registration=2C I see that it shows "Cont Motor A&C65 series". While that is technically correct (the A75 that now powers it is in that Continental series)=2C I'm wondering what happens when one re-engines with something different? There is no way that I can see to change that information on an FAA registration form... only owner's name=2C address=2C and contact info. Another example=2C my ex hangar-mate's Druine Turbulent has a VW on it=2C but the registration shows a Menasco.Oscar ZunigaMedford=2C ORAir Camper NX41CC "Scout"A75 power ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: airlion2(at)gmail.com
I think Cirrus is the NEW doctor killer.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
I think Cirrus is the NEW doctor killer.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: gliderx5(at)comcast.net
I thoughT that the gross wt limitation was 1320 lbs. GardinerSent from my iPadOn Aug 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote:> > As long as the gross weight of the plane is less than 1230 lbs you can fly itas a light sport. LSA designation is for the factory built plane and the E-LSAwould be a kit or plans built Light sport. Your airplane is better kept inthe experimental category. Fewer restrictions and will holder more value ifyou decide to sell it. I have been flying mine for about six years without amedical. All you need is a current drivers license. Don't change a thing.> > --------> Scott Liefeld> Flying N11MS since March 1972> Steel Tube> C-85-12> Wire Wheels> Brodhead in 1996> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 172#406172> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 00:49:56 +0000 (UTC)
I thoughT that the gross wt limitation was 1320 lbs. GardinerSent from my iPadOn Aug 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote:> > As long as the gross weight of the plane is less than 1230 lbs you can fly itas a light sport. LSA designation is for the factory built plane and the E-LSAwould be a kit or plans built Light sport. Your airplane is better kept inthe experimental category. Fewer restrictions and will holder more value ifyou decide to sell it. I have been flying mine for about six years without amedical. All you need is a current drivers license. Don't change a thing.> > --------> Scott Liefeld> Flying N11MS since March 1972> Steel Tube> C-85-12> Wire Wheels> Brodhead in 1996> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... 172#406172> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 00:49:56 +0000 (UTC)
Pietenpol-List: Speed
Original Posted By: danhelsper(at)aol.com
after sitting through some airfoil forums at OSH I surmised that it just might have something to do with the fact that I supported the aft edge-top of the wing LE ply so that it couldn't (didn't) sink-down with the fabric shrinking. What do y'all think?I can't believe ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Speed
after sitting through some airfoil forums at OSH I surmised that it just might have something to do with the fact that I supported the aft edge-top of the wing LE ply so that it couldn't (didn't) sink-down with the fabric shrinking. What do y'all think?I can't believe ________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Speed
Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Original Posted By: "AircamperN11MS"
Sorry- messed up on that last one. What I was trying to say was that I can't believe I can't raise some opinions on this.after sitting through some airfoil forums at OSH I surmised that it just might have something to do with the fact that I supported the aft edge-top of the wing LE ply so that it couldn't (didn't) sink-down with the fabric shrinking. What do y'all think?Dan HelsperPryear, TN________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Sorry- messed up on that last one. What I was trying to say was that I can't believe I can't raise some opinions on this.after sitting through some airfoil forums at OSH I surmised that it just might have something to do with the fact that I supported the aft edge-top of the wing LE ply so that it couldn't (didn't) sink-down with the fabric shrinking. What do y'all think?Dan HelsperPryear, TN________________________________________________________________________________Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: To LSA or not to LSA
Pietenpol-List: Re: finger strainer problem
Original Posted By: "bdewenter"
Gardiner,You are correct. 1320 lbs. I always seem to make that mistake. Thanks for thecatch.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: finger strainer problem
Gardiner,You are correct. 1320 lbs. I always seem to make that mistake. Thanks for thecatch.--------Scott LiefeldFlying N11MS since March 1972Steel TubeC-85-12Wire WheelsBrodhead in 1996Read this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... ___Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: finger strainer problem
Original Posted By: "Douwe Blumberg"
Thanks everyone. Ill use a tap and the correct thread fluid for sealing all fuelfittings.--------Bob 'Early Builder' DewenterDayton OHRead this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... __________
Thanks everyone. Ill use a tap and the correct thread fluid for sealing all fuelfittings.--------Bob 'Early Builder' DewenterDayton OHRead this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p ... __________
Re: Pietenpol-List: finger strainer problem
Original Posted By: Steve Ruse
Thanks for the update on the pipe tape. I=99ll get the right stuff from Wicks, they sell it also and they are a half hour from me.Dennis
Thanks for the update on the pipe tape. I=99ll get the right stuff from Wicks, they sell it also and they are a half hour from me.Dennis