Original Posted By: michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov
Thought about your idea Mike=2C but I like simple (read easy) so I'm going with the 3/4" spar idea. Yours could be lighter=2C cheaper and stronger though.Doug Dever=0AIn beautiful Stow Ohio
RE: Pietenpol-List: one man's spar idea.....flying for 16 years and 450
RE: Pietenpol-List: Re: spar strength
Original Posted By: boyerjrb(at)comcast.net
I believe several=2C including the last original use 3/4 spars. Who says it's not up to the task?Doug Dever=0AIn beautiful Stow OhioDate: Thu=2C 31 Jul 2014 16:23:04 +0000
I believe several=2C including the last original use 3/4 spars. Who says it's not up to the task?Doug Dever=0AIn beautiful Stow OhioDate: Thu=2C 31 Jul 2014 16:23:04 +0000
Pietenpol-List: one man's spar idea.....flying for 16 years and 45
Original Posted By: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A =0A =0A=0A =0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A =0A =0A=0A =0A=0A=0A